How has the therapeutic use of self been used over time throughout Occupational Therapy’s history?
Cancer in the Community e-learning course
The Royal Marsden School has launched a free Cancer in the Community e-learning course.
The course is composed of four standalone modules (40 to 50 minutes duration each):
Cancer Prevention and Screening
Cancer Diagnosis and Staging
Living With and Beyond Cancer
The materials have been written by clinical specialists and experts at The Royal Marsden School and will enable healthcare professionals of all grades, working in a range of community settings, to broaden their knowledge of key aspects of cancer care. This work was commissioned by Health Education England (HEE) and is available nationally. Key features include:
Videos and animation to enhance the learning and emphasise key areas
Quizzes to embed learning and track progress
‘Deeper dive’ resources and workbook to enable learners to explore topics in more depth, and to record their own personal learning and reflection
Certificate upon completion
This e-learning course will be relevant to all qualified and non-qualified community-based health and social care workers, including community matrons, nursing staff, allied health professionals (including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists and dieticians) and support workers who meet patients with cancer.
The modules are available on the e-learning for healthcare website (either on an open access basis or for registered users) or you can download the source files from the NHS eLearning Repository to use in your own Learning Management System or Virtual Learning Environment. Alternatively, if you are unable to download from these sources or would like further information, please contact the School:
The stroke resource- STARs website.
occupational therapy.com resources (esp for USA conversion)
quality /service improvement online course
This new e-learning course may be of interest for those of you thinking about Quality or Service Improvement activities
The HQIP site itself is well worth a browse to update yourself on what is happening in Quality/Service Improvement.
values based training- complete all five ethical scenarios and will get CPD certificate
If you need reminding what Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is, check here.
Not sure what Trish was up to but this article is printed in really small font and I had to zoom to 170% in order to be able to read it.
Zoom activated, I could now tell the article discusses some limitations of EBP, and the authors argue that although EBP has many benefits it has created some unintended negatives as well, which they describe as:
★ Drug companies controlling the research agenda, meaning evidence base is biassed according to their vested interests. Examples include fiddling inclusion criteria to make it likely people who will create desired results will participate, and only publishing positive results.
★ Volume of evidence has become unmanageable. We’ve all done a CINAHL search and returned 1,062 results. You don’t see how you can narrow your search terms anymore and you certainly can’t read all the abstracts…
★ Benefits identified as statistically significant may actually provide negligible difference to patients in real life situations. Especially when research is carried out poorly, eg small sample size or drug company fiddling as mentioned above, the efficacy of treatment is falsely inflated for what it would actually be on a real population.
★ Inflexible rules risk healthcare becoming management-driven (following technical instruction) rather than client-centred (using clinical expertise). Eg creating protocols or checklists from EBP and then only following these in patient care. Like the QOF, where GPs get money for achieving health targets- Greenhalgh suggests that patients are monitored and provided check-box medication if they meet the QOF criteria, without consultation about their individual circumstances (client-centred care). This is a point Cohen & Hersh (2004) agree with. O’Halloran et al (2010) follow on by saying that the technical guidelines produced by EBP stifle creativity.
★ Evidence available for individual conditions and not for co-morbidity, making it difficult to find evidence for patients with multiple diagnoses. An aging population plus better management of chronic disease means more people have multiple conditions, which research studies don’t cover, removing individualised patient care.
Greenhalgh et al (2014) suggest overcoming these negatives by providing individualised care taking the context and even professional creativity into account. Patient advocacy groups should dictate areas of research more than companies. Peer-reviewed publishers should up their standards for article inclusion, and information should be disseminated in more user-friendly ways/methods (like infographics/via YouTube).
Note: apparently comorbidity is more than one illness in a person, and multimorbidity is more than two illnesses in the same person.